E-Commerce Act Malaysia: SMEs Demand Enforcement

E-Commerce Act Malaysia: SMEs Demand Enforcement

Malaysia is rewriting the E-Commerce Act Malaysia has operated under since 2006, and the two associations representing the country’s SMEs and retail chains say the rewrite means nothing without enforcement. The SME Association of Malaysia and the Malaysia Retail Chain Association told a joint press conference on 2 October 2026 that the influx of low-priced products through cross-border platforms is hollowing out local retail, and that the bill replacing the Electronic Commerce Act 2006 must close that gap.

The Edge Malaysia quote from SMEAM on the e-commerce law revision, including the call to force cross-border platforms to register here

The Edge Malaysia, SMEAM on the e-commerce law, 2 October 2026. Captured 3 October 2026 from https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/820386

What the E-Commerce Act Malaysia rewrite covers

The timeline is now public. Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali said on 19 September that the new bill should be finalised this year, with engagement planned across platforms, service providers and industry players. The MCMC has separately said registration requirements for e-commerce platforms are being considered – a step that would touch Shopee, Lazada and TikTok Shop directly.

The E-Commerce Act Malaysia rewriteDetailSource
Law being replacedElectronic Commerce Act 2006Act 658, laws of Malaysia
Government targetBill finalised this yearMinister Armizan, 19 Sep 2026
Regulator positionPlatform registration requirements under considerationMCMC, as reported 2 Oct 2026
Association ask 1Enforcement at entry and on complaint handlingSMEAM, 2 Oct 2026
Association ask 2Foreign platforms to register locallyMRCA, 2 Oct 2026
Consultation statusSMEAM says it has not been consultedSMEAM, 2 Oct 2026
“We are not stopping them from coming. We are not against them coming in. But we are just saying this is the situation that we face. What can you do? I think one of the very important key things is our enforcement.” Dr Chin Chee Seong, national president, SMEAM, joint press conference, 2 October 2026 (The Edge Malaysia, https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/820386)

The register-locally proposal

MRCA president Datuk Liew Bin put forward the sharpest structural ask: force foreign platforms to register in Malaysia. “What we propose to the government is to force them to register here. So, when we force them to register, we can regulate them,” he said. Registration, in the associations’ logic, is the precondition for everything else – product safety enforcement, seller identity verification, and a working complaints channel for businesses and consumers.

The Edge Malaysia paragraph stating the government is working on a new e-commerce bill to replace the Electronic Commerce Act 2006

The Edge Malaysia, replacement of the Electronic Commerce Act 2006, 2 October 2026. Captured 3 October 2026 from https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/820386

The gap SMEAM flagged

SMEAM says it has not been consulted on the bill’s contents – “there’s no discussion with us,” Chin said. For a law deciding platform liability, seller verification and cross-border flows, the absence of the SME voice at the drafting stage is the associations’ core procedural complaint.

Separately flagged: MRCA also called for the 90-day visa-free entry arrangement for Chinese nationals to be cancelled, alleging some foreigners use it to operate businesses without licences, and announced a member survey plus a request for a government reporting hotline. That is a contested ask that goes beyond e-commerce; we report it as their position, not as an established fact.

What it means for sellers

For Malaysian sellers on Shopee, Lazada and TikTok Shop, the bill’s practical impact hinges on three things: whether foreign platforms must register locally, whether product standards are enforced at entry rather than after complaints, and whether a genuine reporting channel exists for non-compliant goods. SMEAM’s Budget 2027 submission and the enforcement ask are two halves of the same cost-competitiveness argument.

The enforcement problem is structural, not political

It is easy to read this as local retailers complaining about cheap imports. The more useful reading is a regulatory capacity problem. Malaysia’s consumer protection and product safety regime was built for goods arriving through ports and licensed importers, where a single inspection point catches a container. Cross-border e-commerce replaced the container with millions of individually addressed parcels, each below the threshold that triggers duty or inspection. No amount of new legislation fixes that arithmetic on its own – which is precisely why SMEAM and MRCA keep returning to registration as the enabling condition.

Registration changes the enforcement surface. A platform with a Malaysian legal entity can be served with a notice, held to product standards, and required to suspend a non-compliant seller. A platform with no local presence can be asked nicely. That is the whole argument, and it is why the MCMC’s consideration of platform registration is the detail that matters most in this story.

What to watch next

Three markers. First, whether the bill tabled this year includes a registration or licensing regime, and at what threshold. Second, whether SMEAM and MRCA are brought into consultation before the draft is finalised – the associations’ complaint about being uninvolved is a test of the process, not the policy. Third, whether a complaints channel is created with published response times, because an enforcement regime without a reporting mechanism is a press release.

Sources

  • MCMC – official website
  • KPDN – Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living
  • The Edge Malaysia, “SME, retail groups call for stronger enforcement amid revision of E-Commerce Act”, 2 October 2026
  • The Edge Malaysia, “SME association says govt assistance in Budget 2027 should focus on outcomes”, 2 October 2026